Henry and Ann of Lanchester and Durham
The following is an exception to the rule that the
surname Brockett did not derive from Brock. It also
proves that not all Brockett clans are related.
1. Durham St Oswalds
A headstone in Durham St Oswalds churchyard records the burials
of Henry and Ann Brockett in 1792 aged 72 and
1794 aged 70 respectively. They should therefore have
been baptised c 1720 and 1724. Henry's will shows that he was
a Yeoman from Croxdale, a Chapelry in St Oswalds
parish, where he farmed fields called Outherin Closes, probably
part of the Salvin estate (DUASC T 1794).
Other Brockets had been baptised, married and buried in Durham
St Oswalds 1644-1823, so it was thought likely that Henry
was part of that clan, or of another Durham City one. But
Henry's baptism does not appear in any Durham registers.
Nor indeed did any of his children's.
In fact he came from Lanchester, 8 miles
to the west, where he and Ann married in 1742 and stayed for
at least another 22 yearstheir youngest son was baptised
there 1764.
2. Lanchester
There are 2 indexes to the Lanchester Parish
Registers:
- Book 93 which records marriages 1561-1837 and has one
Brocket entry: Henry and Ann Aynsley 1742, as transcribed
into the IGI.
- An older index, Book 131, which records baptisms, marriages
and burials 1560-1781 and provides folio references to the
actual Register Books (now on microfilm M42/687).
Book 131 has 3 Brocket entries with folio
references as follows:
| Henry Brocket & Ann Aynsley |
C f 19 |
| William Brocket son of Henry |
C f 27 |
| Deborah Brocket daughter of Anthony |
D f 21 |
Who might Anthony Brocket have been? The actual folios record:
| Henry Brocket & Ann Aynsley |
married 27 Dec 1742 |
both of this parish |
| William |
baptised 28 May 1745 |
son of Henry & Ann Brocket
of Broom-house |
| Deborah |
baptised 23 May 1748 |
daughter of Henry &
Ann Brocket of Langley Lane |
showing:
- 'Anthony' was a transcription error by the compiler of
the index and Deborah was in fact the daughter of Henry
and Ann, as reflected later in Henry's will.
- William was baptised in Lanchester. This had been missed
by the IGI transcribers.
- Henry and Ann lived on in Lanchester after their marriage
in 1742, through 1745 to 1748.
- Henry and Ann were both natives of Lanchester.
Why though weren't there any other Brockets in the Lanchester
registers, and why only the baptisms of two of Henry and Anne's
five children? His will mentioned Hugh, John and Mary as well.
A glance at preceding pages of Book 131 provides the solution.
While there was only one Brocket recorded
in Lanchester of Henry's generation and beforehimself
there were more than 30 Brocks. Moreover,
they had names which tallied with Henry's family, like Hugh,
Deborah and Henry. More particularly, there was a marriage
record of a Deborah Brock to a Samuel Wild. Henry's
will shows that his daughter Deborah married a Wild.
- Henry Brocket started life as Henry Brock.
- Although he had been using Brockett at least since his
marriage in 1742, he continued to use Brock
as well at least into his 40s.
- Three of his five children were baptised as Brocks
in Lanchester, including the last one, John, as late as
1764.
- His eldest daughter Deborah, although baptised
as a Brocket, married as a Brock 24 years later
in 1772.
A few Brocks from Register Books C and D:
| Year |
Brock |
Event |
Lanchester Parish Register
entry |
| 1721 |
Henry |
baptised 9 Jul |
son of William Brooke
of Broomhouse |
| 1722 |
Hugh |
buried 10 Jul |
of Broom House [brother
of Henry?] |
| 1737 |
William |
buried 16 Jul |
of Broom house [father
of Henry?] |
| 1743 |
Hugh |
baptised 27 Dec |
son of Henry Brock
of Broom-house |
| 1746 |
Mary |
baptised
13 May |
daughter
of Henry & Ann Brock of Langley Lane |
| 1753 |
John |
buried 21 Jan |
son of William &
Elizabeth Brock of Langley Lane [brother of Henry?] |
| 1764 |
John |
baptised 26 Nov |
son of Henry &
Ann Brock of Stobbilee |
| 1772 |
Deborah |
married 8 Aug |
of this parish, to
Samuel Wild of the parish of Chester le Street, by licence. |
| |
|
|
Note: All the baptisms
above are in the IGI apart from Henry's 1721. |
It appears that Henry grew up in Broomhouse and was joined
there by Ann during the time of the birth of their first two
children (Hugh and William). Then they lived in Langley Lane,
where their next two were born (Mary and Deborah). For their
last (John) they were at Stobbilee Farm.
William BROOKE of Broomhouse bur 1737
____________________________|
| | |
?| ?| |
William BROCK Hugh BROCK Henry BROCK/ET Yeoman m Ann AYNSLEY
m Elizabeth bur 1722 bap 1721 bur 1792 1742 bur 1794
... |
|
| _____________________________________|_________________
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
John BROCK Hugh William Mary Deborah John Gent 1764-1827
bur 1753 1743- Gent 1746 1748-bef 1821 m 1787 Frances Sophia
bef 1821 1745-1821 m m 1772 Samuel TROTTER d 1833
| no issue NEASOM WILD issue |
| |
__________| ___________________________________________|_____________
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Henry Mary John Trotter Margaret George Mary William Henry Henry
alive m 1788-1842 1791-1841 1794-1818 1799 1804-1867 MP Jamaica
1821 Joseph 2 sons unm Havana 6 daus 5 sons 1807-87
FURNACE
|
| Sources: Lanchester
Parish Registers, wills of Henry d 1792 and William d
1821, St Catherine's House Index. |
| |
Henry described himself in his will as 'Yeoman'. He himself
could not write, but his sons could. John
for one was well educated. The 19th century saw the family
spread out around the world from Havana to China and
from Jamaica to New Zealand.
- Hugh. Did his son Henry
move to Newcastle: will of Henry Brockett of Newcastle 1774
(DUASC T 26)?
- William of Redhouse, Broom, Elvet, Gent, will proved 1821
(DUASC T)
- Mary
- Deborah
- John.
|