Earliest Records
The name Broket goes back to 1170, perhaps 1140.
These dates are simply based on the oldest surviving record,
so the name may well have been used earlier. 10 instances
from various places in England have been found in the 13th
C, 28 in the 14thmainly from Yorkshire. The 2 in mainland
Europe were linked to England. Nearly all would have been
married and heads of household, but wives'
and children's names rarely appear in such records.
Note: The surname is spelt 'Broket' in this website when
no specific variant
is being referred to.
| 13th
Century: |
Few
of the 10 appear to have been related. Surnames
were too new and the places too far flung to suggest that
these Brokets had sprung from one or two sources. |
| 14th
Century: |
82%
of the 28 were from Yorkshire, mostly from the
Ainsty, York's
SW hinterland: the first sustained hereditary
centre of the surname. Even disregarding the
13 payers of the 1379 poll tax for York and the Ainsty,
Yorkshire Brokets comprised 67% or more of all other 14th
C records, and most 15th C Broket records come from Yorkshire
too.
Although by no means everyone had their names recorded
in these times and although records have got lost, we
probably know more than half the household heads
from this century, since:
| the 28 are spread over
the century |
| at any point during
it there are estimated
to have been 17 Broket households. |
|
In 1207 Crespin and Osbert Brochet were pledged to bring a certain
Hugh FitzRalph to court. This they failed to do, so two others
were appointed as pledges. In 1207 Crespin and Osbert would
have been in their late 20s at least and born by 1180.
| If they were brothers and their father had been given
the name in his teenswhen most bynames emergedthere
was a Broket at least by 1170, perhaps by 1160. |
| |
| If they were cousins, there was a Broket at
least by 1150, perhaps by 1140. |
Stixwould was a Nunnery, about 5 miles SW of Horncastle,
18 miles W of the Percy
manor of Claxby and about 13 miles E of Lincoln. 1207 was
during King John's reignof Magna Carta fame. Crespin and Osbert
may well not have been from Lincolnshirea generally
marshy and inhospitable environment, into which men moved
for work.
| Date/source |
Latin |
English translation |
1207
KB26/46
m 4
(cf CCR 46: 8-10 John,
p 56) |
Linc'
. Frater Walterus positus
loco. Magistri ordinis de stikewaud
optulit se iiij. die uersus hugonem
filium Radulfi de placito Warancie
aduocacione ecclesia de Lauinton'
et ipse non uenit uel
se essoniauit
et positus fuit per plegios
scilicet Crespinum. et
Osbertum Brochet. Et ideo
ponatur
per meliores plegios etc a
die sancti Martini in xv. dies. etc.
|
Lincolnshire
- Brother Walter, defendant in place of the Master of
the Order of Stixwould, appeared
in court on the 4th day against Hugh
FitzRalph concerning a plea of claim for the advowson
of the church of Lavinton': Hugh did not appear or excused
himself
and he was to have been brought there by pledges, i.e.
Crespin and Osbert Brochet. He should
therefore be brought
by better pledges etc on the quinzaine of St Martin's
day (26 Nov). |
1207
KB26/46
m 7d
(cf CCR 46: 8-10 John,
p 74)
|
Linc'
. Walterus Atornatus magistri de
Stikewaud' optulit se iiij. die.
uersus Hugonem filium Radulfi
de placito Warencie aduocacione
Ecclesie de Lauinton' quam habet
per cartam Radulfi patris
sui et ipse non uenit uel
se essoniauit et positus fuit [per
plegios] scilicet Crespinum
et Osbertum brochet
et postea per meliores plegios
scilicet Simonem prepositum
et Gilebertum de herdwic et Ideo
consideratum est quod
vicecomes habeat corpus hugonis etc.
et plegii sunt In misericordia. Dies
est a die sancti hillarii in xv. dies. |
Lincolnshire.
Walter, attorney of the lord of Stixwould,
appeared in court on the 4th day against Hugh son of Ralph
concerning a plea of claim for the advowson of the church
of Lavinton', which he held by a deed from his father
Ralph.
Hugh did not appear or excused himself and he was defended
[by pledges], i.e. Crespin and Osbert Brochet,
and afterwards by better pledges, i.e. Simon the Provost
and Gilbert of Hardwic. And therefore judgement was made
that
the sheriff should arrest Hugh, etc and the pledges are
amerced to the quinzaine of St Hilary's day (28 Jan). |
The compiler of the 1931 Calendar
for the first entry mistranscribed Brochet as Brechet.
ch
was the earliest spelling of the k sound in Broket,
but e for o was an error. There has never been a name Breket
in the English-speaking world.
| Date/source |
Latin |
English translation |
1214
C54/6
(cf RLC,
vol 1,
p 142)
|
Rex
dilecto et fideli suo Emerico
de Rupe et Eschuward' etcetera
Mandamus uobis quod sine
dilatione plenariam saisinam
habere faciatis Willelmo Brochet
de terris suis unde disseisitus fuit
occasione seruicij nostri.
Teste me ipso apud
Limouic. iij die Aprilis. |
The King
to his beloved and faithful Amery of Rupe &
Eschuward etc. We order you without delay to
cause William Brochet to have full seisin
of his lands of which he was dispossessed while he was
[away] on our service. Witnessed by myself
in Limoges 3 Apr |
William had lands and went away on the King's service.
He must therefore have been at least 25 years old when he
returned in 1214, and so born before 1190.
Was he given the name as a nickname or by birth?
Emericus de Rupe Cavardi became 9th Count de Rochechouart
1245, knight 1253 and died 1285 (Roles Gascons vol
1 pp 406, 408, and vol 1 Supplement p 97). He would have been
young in 1214.
By spring 1205 King John had lost the last of his French
possessions and returned to England. The final 10 years of
his reign were occupied with failed attempts to regain these
territories, like this attempt in 1214 from Limoges, c 200
miles south of Paris. A year later the discontented barons
revolted, capturing London in May 1215. Then at Runnymeade
in June, John succumbed to pressure and signed the Magna Carta.
William Broket was in the service of Margery, wife of Sir Richard
de Rivers, who died in the early 1240s (Complete Peerage
vol 11 p 13). Along with a servant of the king's chamberlain,
William was co-entrusted with the delivery of the large
sum of 10,000 marks from Winchester to the King in Gascony in
SW France. Margery was Countess of the Isle of Wight which may
account for William being selected for this duty to the Crown.
The Isle is c 20 miles S of Winchester.
This was an important mission; probably carrying
most of the army's pay for that year. 10,000 marcs
was equivalent to £6,666 at the time. 150 years later
in 1410 the whole budget for the defence of Gascony was £8249
(Pugh 1988 p 52). To have joint responsibility for so valuable
a mission, William would have been in his 30s at least,
born before 1212. If William's father had not been
called Broket before him, then this emergence of the nickname
can be dated at latest 1225-8.
Following his 1230 campaign in Gascony Henry III was in debt
and in 1232 the great council allowed him to raise a tax.
Another tax was levied in 1235 and another in 1237. These
were probably the source of the 10,000 marks. The
first of the following 2 letters was from Windsor
recording the beginning of the mission and the second
was from King Henry in Bordeaux about 5 weeks later
recording his receipt of the money. Note: the Wardrobe was
an office, moving around with the king.
| Date/source |
Latin |
English translation |
1242
Nov 30
Windsor
C66/54
m 4 |
1. Rex
omnibus etcetera salutem
Sciatis quod decem milia marcarum
de Thesauro nostro que dilectus clericus
Robertus Passelewe habuit in custodia
sua in castro nostro Wintoniensi
liberauit per preceptum nostrum
dilecto
2. et fideli nostro Iohanno de Grimsted'
militi Willelmo Maudut Camerarij
nostri et Willelmo Broket
seruienti dilecte nobis in cristo
Margery de Riparijs Comitisse de Insula
carianda ad nos
3. in Gascon' Ita quod prefatus Robertus
inde quietus est In cuius etc Teste
Willelmus Eboracensi Archiepiscopo
apud Windles' .xxx. die Nouembris. |
1. The
King to all etc greetings. Know that 10,000 marks
from our Treasury which the beloved clerk Robert Passelewe
had in his keeping in our castle of Winchester and delivered
by our order to our beloved
2. and faithful John de Grimsted, knight, William Maudut,
our chamberlain, and William Broket,
servant of our beloved in Christ Margery de Rivers, Countess
of the Isle [of Wight], to be carried to us
3. in Gascony. Thus [the condition of this is] that the
said Robert is quit thereof. In [witness] of which etc.
Witnessed by William Archbishop of York at Windsor 30
November. |
1243
Jan 8
Bordeaux
C66/53
m 20 |
Quia
redditus fuit breue littere
de quietantie de Thesauro Regis
1. Rex omnibus &c salutem Sciatis quod
recepimus apud Burd' die marcis prima ante
natale domini anno & cetera vicesimo
septimo per manum
2. Reyneri Le Tayllur missi ex parte dilecti
& fideli nostri Willelmi Mauduit
camerarii nostri et per manum Willelmi
Broket missi ex parte margarie
de
3. Rypariis decem milia marcarum que ibidem
liberata fuerant in Garderoba nostra
dilecto clerico nostro Petro
chaceporc custodi eiusdem
4. Garderobi nostre In cuius rei &c Teste
ut supra. |
[Margin:]
Because payment has been made [here is]
a writ [authorising] letters of quittance from the king's
Treasury.
1. The King to all &c greetings. Know that on the first
Tuesday before Christmas in the year &c 27 (1243) we received
at Bordeaux by the hand of
2. Reyner Le Tayllur, sent on behalf of our beloved and
faithful chamberlain William Mauduit, and by the hand
of William Broket, sent on behalf of
Margery de
3. Rypariis, 10,000 marks which were delivered there in
our Wardrobe to our beloved clerk Peter Chaceporc, keeper
of
4. our same Wardrobe. In [witness] of which &c. Witnessed
as above. |
Note: The Calendar translation
for the 1242 letter has a couple of small errors and the
one for the 1243 has: 'by the hand of William Braket'
(Calendar of Patent Rolls 1266-72 (Appendix)
p 719; 1243 p 355).
In this hand the o has a short downward stroke
on its right hand side, while the a has a longer
one beginning above the left hand loop of the letter and
finishing below it. This difference between the 2 letters
can be seen at the end of the word 'Garderoba' in the
middle of the third line. For a couple of other examples
of the o see the words 'Petro' 5 words to the
right of 'Garderoba' and 'custodi' another 2 words on,
and for a few other examples of the a see the
words 'ante natale' to the right of the middle of the
first line. On a few occasions, however, the right hand
stroke of the a has not been written so long
and this might lead the reader into confusing an o
with an a in unfamiliar words. This was
probably why the name was transcribed Braket instead of
Broket. But a close look at the script of the
whole document confirms that the name here is
Broket, as it was in the 1242 letter about this
same mission five weeks earlier. |
These were feudal times and John Broket
held a bovate of land from a tenant in chief
in Newton Kyme near York, as recorded in the IPM
of William de Kyme (YATARS 1892 vol 12, pp 85-7):
| Inquisition of the fees, held
of William de Kyme, at the time of his
death, in the County of York, made before
the Coroners, by Richard de Colton, ... [21 names] ...,
John Broket of Neuton, ... [15 names]
... They, being sworn, say upon their oath that Mauger
le Vavasur held immediately of William de Kyme in Wlsington,
two carucates of land, whereof twelve carucates
make one knight's fee. Hugh de Brinkel held immediately
of him in the town of Neuton [Newton
Kyme] two bovates and a half of land, whereof fourteen
make a fee. John de Oykumbe held immediately
of him in the same town, two bovates of the same fee.
Elias son of William Clerk held immediately of him in
the same town, four bovates of the same fee. John
Broket held immediately of him in the same town, one bovate...
|
A bovate was apparently only slightly smaller than a carucate
here, which for the Ainsty was usually 120 acres or eight
bovates (M J Harrison 2000 pp 2-3). The Kyme family had been
Percy
tenants (Clay 1963 p 92; M J Harrison 2000 p 281),
and also held lands in Lincolnshire
(Speight 1902 p 366). John would have been head of a household
and probably aged 30 at least in 1260, and so born by 1230.
| Date/source |
Pro
mercatoribus de Dowato |
For merchants
of Douai |
1260 C66/74
m 11
(Patent Roll)
|
1. Rex
omnibus ad quos presentes littere
peruenerint salutem. Sciatis nos
teneri Waltero Pe de Argent seniori Waltero
Pe de Argent Iuniori Iacobo Le Brun Simoni Broket
2. & sociis suis mercatoribus de
Doway in Centum & quinque
libris & duodecim denarijs
sterlingorum pro pannis
ab eis captis ad opus nostrum in nundinis
sancti Iuonis Anno &c .xliiij.
per
3. Ricardum de Ewell & Hugonem de Turri
Emptores garderobe nostre: Quam quidem pecuniam
eis soluere promittimus in
quindena sancti michaelis proximo
futura ad scaccarium nostrum.
4. In cuius rei testimonium &c Teste
me ipso apud sanctum Paulum
London' xiiij Maij. |
1. The
King to all to whom these present documents will come,
greetings. Know that we are bound to Walter Pe de Argent
senior, Walter Pe de Argent junior, James Le Brun, Simon
Broket
2. and colleaguesmerchants of Douaiin £105
12d for fabrics received (taken) from them for
our (the king's) use at the market of St Ives
in the 44th year
3. by Richard de Ewell and Hugh de Turri, buyers of our
Wardrobe; which money we promise to pay them in the quinzaine
of Michaelmas next (1-15 Oct) at our
Treasury
4. In witness of which things etc Witnessed by myself
in St Pauls, London 14 May. |
Simon was a cloth merchant in business with
partners across the Channel. In this bond he is called a merchant
of Douai, but the names of his partners make it likely that
he was the English arm of the partnership. Was he of a different
stock from his contemporary, John
Broket, the small farmer up in Newton Kyme? Much of York's
overseas trade was with Flanders and the Low Countries, especially
for cloth (Palliser 1979 pp 194ff). England exported '30,000
sacks of wool every year, nearly all to Flanders, where there
was a highly developed cloth industry dependent upon English
wool' (Briggs 1999 p 73).
Henry III bought £100 worth of clothcartloads.
It was sold at Easter, the bond was issued 14 May with credit
till early Oct, and payment was received 18 Jan (Calendar
of Liberate Rolls 1260-67 p 72).
St Ives fair, held for a week from the Wednesday after Easter,
was one of England's main international medieval fairs. St
Ives is on the river Great Ouse, near Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire;
the cloth would have come there by boat from Flanders.
The 1279 hundred roll for Bampton recorded that Henry
Broket held a messuage and a yardland in the parish
of Curbridge, about 12 miles W of Oxford, in return for 3s
9d rent a year and 10s 10d worth of work. These hundred rolls
recorded all landholders in England from the highest to the
lowest. Like 33 others of the 39 listed for Curbridge, Henry
was a serf (servus) and 'work' could be
discharged by actual work or by money (E Stone 1968 pp 75-6):
|
Curbridge
|
Freeholders
John de Wodestoke holds in Curbridge 1 messuage and 4
yardlands from the bishop of Exeter and renders to him
8s a year and owes suit to his court every three weeks
and must attend view of frankpledge twice a year. [… Three
more freeholders]
Serfs
Roger ad Fontem holds in Curbridge 1 messuage and 1 yardland
from the bishop of Exeter and renders to him for rent
3s 9d a year, for work 10s 10d. [… 28 others the same,
including:] Henry Broket. Hugh White
holds in Curbridge 1 messuage and half a yardland from
the bishop of Exeter and renders to him for rent 22d halfpenny
a year, for work 5s 5d. [… Three others the same]
Cotters
Joan apud Bruwere holds in Curbridge 1 cottage and 4 acres
from the bishop of Exeter and renders to him 2s a year.
[… One other the same] |
Freeholders often appeared in these rolls as tenants in more
than one village, serfs rarely in more than one place. For
Oxfordshire very little has survived other than Bampton's
return, so it is not known whether there were other
Brokets in Oxfordshire. That there were no more records
of Brokets there until modern times, however, makes it probable
that Henry was either one of a small clan which soon died
out or else a Broket by byname rather than surname.
Kirkby Mallore is about seven miles W of Leicester, 40-45
NW of Bedford, 80 N of Oxford and 107 S of York. It
is not clear if Thomas was related to other known Brokets.
Of his five surviving records, the first in 1290 is as a
surety, and the other four, some 26+ years
later, are all allegations by complainants
that bands of men, Thomas among them, entered and appropriated
their property. The 26 year interval could be a new generation.
| 'In 15th Chancery Proceedings
we hear so often of trespass committed by a number of
persons unknown to the complainant, but armed with all
manner of weapons of war, that we are moved to suspect
that the language is no more than a legal formula' (Kingsford
1926 p 68). |
So after the surety, only the shortest of the 4 complaints
(1319) is quoted here in full:
| Date/source |
Calendar entry |
1290
Sep 16
Newstead
CCR, p 102 |
To the
sheriff of Oxford. Order to cause William Danet,
clerk, imprisoned for receiving certain letters
of John de Monte Forti and Almaric de Monte Forti from
an unknown envoy of theirs, to be borne to Ralph Basset,
to be released, as the King learns by
an inquisition taken by the sheriff of Leicester
that William is imprisoned for receiving the letters,
which he did through his simplicity and not for any malice
aforethought, and William afterwards found the
king William de Appelby, Richard son of Edmund
de Cateby, William son of Sarah de Cateby, Ralph fiz la
Dame of Sutton, William, his brother, Thomas Broket
of Kirkeby, John Curtenay of Kirkeby, Robert
le Tayllur of Pekynton, William Prat of Boseworth, Peter
de Clenefeld, Robert son of Ralph de Kirkeby, and William
le Scot of Kirkeby, all of co. Leicester, who
have mainperned to have him before the king in
his next parliament after Michaelmas. |
1316
May 12
Westminster
CPR, p 499
|
Commission
of oyer and terminer to John Chaynel, William
le Botiller of Wemme and John de le Barewe, on
complaint by Roger de Mortuo Mari of Wyggemore,
that ...[26 names]..., Thomas
Broket of Kirkeby Malure, ...[26 more names]...
and others, entered his manors of Coterugge
and Wychebaud, co. Worcester, and
carried away his goods. |
1316
Jun 1
Westminster
CPR, p 502
|
Commission
of oyer and terminer to John de Crombwelle, John
de Mutford, John de Fresingfeld and Robert de Keleseye,
on complaint by Richard Lovel that
...[12 names]..., Thomas Brokat,
...[19 more names]... with others entered his
manor at Toppesfeld, co. Essex, broke
his houses there and carried away 8 horses, 6
oxen, 6 cows, 5 bullocks and 5 calves, of the price of
42 marks 10s. and other goods. |
1316
Dec 18
Clipstone
CPR, p 600
|
Commission
of oyer and terminer to William le Butiller of
Wemme, John de le Barewe and William de la Hulle, on
complaint by Roger de Mortuo Mari of Wyggemor,
that ...[24 names]..., Thomas
Broket of Kirkeby Malorre, ...[25 more names]...
with others, entered his manors of Coterugge
and Wychebaud, co. Worcester, and carried away
his goods. |
1319
May 28
York
CPR, p 369
|
Commission
of oyer and terminer to John de Cave, John Chaynel
and Robert de Stokes on complaint by
John de Vaus that William 'Dengaynesbaillif'
of Halughton, Thomas Personessone and Richard and Adam
his brothers, and Thomas Broket, with
others, took and carried away his goods
at Halughton, co. Leicester, and assaulted
Richard le Stedeman, Thomas Williamesman, William le Hayward
and Robert Seytonesman, his men. |
The 1319 record is so similar to the others and concerns
Leicestershire that it is presumably the same Thomas, even
though the case was heard in York.
Johne Brokat paid 2s and a farthing in a 10th/6th subsidy for
Sawbridgeworth in 1294 and 8d halfpenny similarly in 1307 (PRO
E179/120/3; E179/120/8). No Brokets are found recorded after
him in tax
lists so he probably had no surviving sons, or else it was
a pure byname he had and which his sons didn't inherit from
him.
John Broket and 3 associates paid a small fine for trespass
and for a licence from the courtprobably to conclude
a property salerecorded in the accounts for the manor
of Lostwithiel (6/7 miles NE of St Austell, Cornwall):
| Date/source |
Latin |
English translation |
1297 Midgley,
pp 241-2
|
Lostwithiel
Redditus. Idem reddit compotum de £8 8s 7d de redditu
assiso per annum.
Summa £8 8s 7d.
Exitus manerii. Idem reddit compotum de 4s 7d de censeriis
hoc anno. Et de £13 6s 8d de firma molendini hoc anno.
…
Summa £14 15s.
Fines, perquisita, et releuia. Idem reddit compotum de
19s 6d de Odone Hardy et 29 sociis suis pro transgressione,
defalta, licencia concordandi, et assisa ceruisie fracta.
Et de 10s 6d de Henrico Lug' et 12 sociis suis pro defalta,
transgressione, et assisa ceruisie fracta. Et de 3s 7d
… Et de 4s 3d … Et de 2s 2d … Et de 13s 4d … Et de 5s
… Et de 3d … Et de 2s … Et de 13s 2d … Et de 3s 6d … Et
de 3s 6d … Et de 2s 6d … Et de 12d de Iohanne
Broket et tribus sociis suis pro transgressione et licencia
concordandi. Et de 20d … Et de 9d … Et de 2s
10d …
Summa £4 9s 6d.
Summa totalis £27 13s 1d. |
Lostwithiel
Rent. The same renders account of £8 8s 7d for fixed rent
per annum.
Sub total £8 8s 7d.
Revenue from manors. The same renders account of 4s 7d
from non-burgess residents this year. And of £13 6s 8d
in rent from the lease of the mill this year. …
Sub total £14 15s.
Fines, profits and dues. The same renders account of 19s
6d from Odo Hardy and 29 associates for trespass, unpaid
dues, a licence to make concord, and unpaid taxes on ale.
And of 10s 6d from Henry Lug' and 12 associates for unpaid
dues, trespass, and unpaid taxes on ale. And of 3s 7d
… And of 4s 3d … And of 2s 2d … And of 13s 4d … And of
5s … And of 3d … And of 2s … And of 13s 2d … And of 3s
6d … And of 3s 6d … And of 2s 6d … And of 12d
from John Broket and three associates for trespass and
a licence to make concord. …
Sub total £4 9s 6d.
Grand total £27 13s 1d. |
Lostwithiel manor was among the lands of Edmund, Earl of
Cornwall and nephew of Henry III, whose northern estate centred
in Knaresbrough Castle (Midgley 1942-5 p xviii). It is possible
that John or his father hailed from Yorkshire.
|